two versions of jāmiʻ al-tamthīl
نویسندگان
چکیده
jāmiʻ al-tamthīlwas written in 11th century ah. by muḥammad ʻalī hablehrūdī. this book is a collection of proverbs, insights and anecdotes and some sermons associated with them. there are a lot of manuscripts of this book in different libraries all over the world. the authors have found two different forms of writing through their critical corrections. although both forms are generally similar, they are fundamentally different in content and style of writing. the differences between these two forms of writing and the reasons why one of them is preferred are payed attention, in present essay, and the incentives which made them to exist are studied. the results show what we know as jāmiʻ al-tamthīl in iran is a different manifestation of hablehrūdī's work and it is likely that someone has changed it and has added to or reduced its content to make jāmiʻ al-tamthīl seem as a merely preaching book, or in other word, or to help its preaching, ethical and religious aspects to overcome its literary aspect.
منابع مشابه
Two alternative versions of strangeness
The concept of strangeness emerged from the low energy phenomenology before the entry of quarks in particle physics. The connection between strangeness and isospin is rather accidental and loose and we recognize later that the definition of strangeness is model-dependent. Indeed, in Gell-Mann's triplet quark model we realize that there is a simple alternative representation of strangeness. When...
متن کاملCausal inference with two versions of treatment
Raiden B. Hasegawa, Sameer K. Deshpande, Dylan S. Small and Paul R. Rosenbaum1 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Abstract. Causal effects are commonly defined as comparisons of the potential outcomes under treatment and control, but this definition is threatened by the possibility that either the treatment or the control condition is not well-defined, existing instead in more than one ve...
متن کاملTwo Versions of an Argument for Particularism
In the article two versions of an argument for particularism are presented and discussed. The first has Avicenna as originator; Donald Mertz is the originator of the second version. While the first version takes for granted a reduction of polyadic attributes, the second does not. In fact, Mertz vehemently rejects the reduction. The article ends with an attempt to make it plausible that Mertz’s ...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
ادب فارسیجلد ۵، شماره ۲، صفحات ۹۷-۱۱۱
کلمات کلیدی
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023